<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsofts H1N1 plan &#8211; keep em busy during swine flu closures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.xodigo.com/microsofts-h1n1-plan-swine-flu-closures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.xodigo.com/microsofts-h1n1-plan-swine-flu-closures/</link>
	<description>Help me test some cool features of WP 3.0 and BPress</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 09:15:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: EVC</title>
		<link>http://www.xodigo.com/microsofts-h1n1-plan-swine-flu-closures/comment-page-1/#comment-41038</link>
		<dc:creator>EVC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 14:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.xodigo.com/?p=806#comment-41038</guid>
		<description>Our population is in the jet age. world travel, urbanization &amp; lifestyle are very different during the 1918 flu pandemic. New emerging infectious diseases is well adopted to our present environment. Hand washing, social distancing &amp; etiquette are disease prevention techniques centered on avoiding contact with the virus.  We need to upgrade &amp; use new technology in dealing with novel diseases. The sheer number of infections today would indicate that the cause of infection is indirect transmission of the disease is probably in public places like airports, supermarkets &amp; others. However, traditional disinfectants used in hospitals are easily inactivated by organic matter, dirt &amp; soil &amp; their required method of application &amp; toxicity is not adoptable to crowded places. For almost 20 years, in the Philippines, MDSDS is a liquid disinfectant not easily inactivated &amp; with very low toxicity level that it can be sprayed to the environment without adverse effects to plants, animals &amp; the environment, simply because it is biodegradable &amp; to a great extent diluted with water. As most medical practitioners doubts the effectiveness on  environment disinfection  they agree that microbes on surfaces are most vulnerable on surfaces where they can easily be destroyed before causing any infection. Without doubt limiting or destroying physically the microbial population on infected surfaces will surely decrease disease transmissions thus protecting  the population. Cleaning &amp; disinfection is an effective, practical, inexpensive &amp; safer method without side effects or dangers compared to exorbitant vaccines &amp; medicines. This method is practiced everyday in hospitals &amp; medical institutions to protect their facilities from infection. For whatever reasons why it  is not emphasized as compared to 1918 protocols such as hand  washing by the WHO &amp; the CDC &amp; the continued spread of the virus in the US is anybody&#039;s guess! Are they really  just selling vaccines? Allowing the virus to survive &amp; spread increases its ability to mutate &amp; hopefully it will spread at the WHO &amp; CDC headquarters!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our population is in the jet age. world travel, urbanization &amp; lifestyle are very different during the 1918 flu pandemic. New emerging infectious diseases is well adopted to our present environment. Hand washing, social distancing &amp; etiquette are disease prevention techniques centered on avoiding contact with the virus.  We need to upgrade &amp; use new technology in dealing with novel diseases. The sheer number of infections today would indicate that the cause of infection is indirect transmission of the disease is probably in public places like airports, supermarkets &amp; others. However, traditional disinfectants used in hospitals are easily inactivated by organic matter, dirt &amp; soil &amp; their required method of application &amp; toxicity is not adoptable to crowded places. For almost 20 years, in the Philippines, MDSDS is a liquid disinfectant not easily inactivated &amp; with very low toxicity level that it can be sprayed to the environment without adverse effects to plants, animals &amp; the environment, simply because it is biodegradable &amp; to a great extent diluted with water. As most medical practitioners doubts the effectiveness on  environment disinfection  they agree that microbes on surfaces are most vulnerable on surfaces where they can easily be destroyed before causing any infection. Without doubt limiting or destroying physically the microbial population on infected surfaces will surely decrease disease transmissions thus protecting  the population. Cleaning &amp; disinfection is an effective, practical, inexpensive &amp; safer method without side effects or dangers compared to exorbitant vaccines &amp; medicines. This method is practiced everyday in hospitals &amp; medical institutions to protect their facilities from infection. For whatever reasons why it  is not emphasized as compared to 1918 protocols such as hand  washing by the WHO &amp; the CDC &amp; the continued spread of the virus in the US is anybody&#8217;s guess! Are they really  just selling vaccines? Allowing the virus to survive &amp; spread increases its ability to mutate &amp; hopefully it will spread at the WHO &amp; CDC headquarters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.xodigo.com @ 2010-07-31 08:53:16 -->